Category: psychology

New job starts tomorrow!

New job starts tomorrow working for Dr. Drieghe! Can’t wait to find out what I’ll be doing. Although I expect I will spend the morning harassing the uni computing people about installing the software I need. 48 hours of emails and all I’ve got is a question asking what system I’m running, after I’ve already given them the reference no. of the computer that belongs to them. Strange, crazy people…I shall be nagging tomorrow using my formal English voice that I get out for special complaining occasions.

Still tomorrow should be fun! :)

Exams are over, let the working begin!

Exams are over! How I’ve waited for this day! Now to remember what I did before revision took over my life…was it something to do with genes/children/pop psych? No…I would hope not.

So currently having a relaxing bank holiday, doing exactly nothing. I may paint my nails while watching some junk films, but that is as much as I intend to do today. Anyway, I have to be up early tomorrow for my induction! w00t! I get to get a new staff card with the same details as the one I just handed in, hopefully not with the same ‘just dug up’ picture, but I expect it will be. At least I can scare small children with it I suppose. I get to have an induction around the department tomorrow, which should be short seeing as I spend a lot of time in there already. I’m really looking forward to working in the psych department, I owe many thanks/favours/drinks for the opportunity! Unfortunately I have to share an office with a certain Dr.Godwin. Tsch, there’s always a down side!

Revising…

I hate revising or learning things for the first time in some cases. I’m a bit more chilled now, but still in countdown to exam mode. Less than two weeks and I’m free!

One happy happy joy joy thing to look forward to is that I’m pretty much all sorted to do research assistant work this summer. Extremely happy about this and really looking forward to it!

No more posts till after exam stress now…bai bai

Pop psych…not popular with me

First night of my notice! Everything bad about the job now makes me happy, especially now I know the end is nigh.

Currently researching pop psychology essay, but it is annoying to research something your just going to slate for 1500 words.  Considering personality typing as a topic, but there isn’t much recent stuff, except in management journals. Management love personality typing, especially in supermarkets! I remember first going to apply for a job at M&S, you couldn’t apply in store, you had to complete an online personality test (talent screening) first before you could have an interview.

The test had questions about how you would act in different scenarios, and the choice of answers were all acceptable things to do and extremly similar (e.g. you finish a task, do you – a)help busy collegue, b)ask supervisor what to do, c)recheck work). Anyway, I filled the questionnaire out and got rejected because I favoured the answers about organisation and efficiency over customer service, which seeing as I was applying for a job early mornings before the shop opened, I figured I was fine. Alas, I had failed. There was so many things about the questionnaire that just seemed weird, there seemed no way of of assessing it, or even telling which answer was correct!

A quick google later I have the answers and an interview and was employed within three days. I would love to meet who came up with the idea of having a very poor personality test as a screening process for interviews. Even a good personality test surely could not say who is better suited to stacking fruit and veg. Maybe if I’m stuck for work again I can use my psychology skills to examine the customer base in supermarkets, it’s always surprising to see the same elderly people come in every morning to buy a lime, a handful of grapes and a can of gin and tonic.

Anyway, back to researching this fun topic…

Mean accuracy of existing is unlikely due to chance

I seem to get a lot of hits to this post from people googling the phrase “unlikely due to chance”. In fact the majority of my traffic comes from this! (SEO worked well, even if it was by accident!) Before this post was probably the most un-useful thing to find if your googling this phrase, as it only consisted of myself moaning about assignments. Seeing as I am a geek for stats I shall explain the phrase so I can stop annoying people.

Basically, when doing statistics, everything is down to probability and chance. The probability of a coin flip is 50/50. There are two events that can happen “heads” and “tails” and both have an equal chance of happening. However, in most statistical analysis it will never be this simple, but what you will want to know is:

Has variable A had an effect on variable B?

OR

How likely is it that the effects observed are due to chance? Could these results have just randomly been picked from a hat of possible results, so in fact there is no affect between variable A and variable B?

The point of conducting controlled experiments and then analysing the data is that you need to prove what you have observed is actually what you have observed. There is no point saying one number is bigger than the other and this proves something, as this could be just due to random chance. You need to prove your results.

A simple example:

Variable A (amount of sleep) and variable B (test score). Does the amount of sleep you have the night before a test improve the test scores?

A psychology student is conducting an experiment to see if the amount of sleep you have the night before a test improves the test score. There are two groups, one has their normal amount of sleep and the other group are prevented from sleeping.

On these results you can then perform the appropriate statistical test (in this case an unpaired t-test), and find out if the test scores are significantly different depending on the amount of sleep. You will be able to see if they are significantly different from the p value.

p values are the probability that a result happened by chance. In psychology for the p value to be significant it has to be p<.05. If you have a p value <.05 this means that there is less than 5% chance of getting the results by chance. Meaning that it is very likely that variable A is, in fact, having an effect on variable B and furthermore very unlikely that the result is due to chance. If the p value is not significant i.e. it is >.05. Your results could have happened by chance and it is likely that there is no effect between the two variables tested.

So…in conclusion “unlikely due to chance” is simply when you have tested variables and found a significant p value, p<.05, the results you have found are unlikely to be due to chance.


ORIGINAL POST – most dull

Finally back to the land of the existing people. I’d say land of the living and be cliche, alas having three large assignments to do is not what I would define as living. My desktop background is nothing more than a taunting ghoul. It consists of all my deadlines, on both my monitors, I’d love to crossed them all off and bask in front of the completed list, or at least pretend for a few minutes. Meh.

Unfortunately, due to my constant germ-age this month I am more behind than I would prefer and will be spending the next three days doing nothing but faux stats, learning theory and some kind of plasticity essay that I have no idea about yet. Not good. Though I have already spent a good 4 hours on my faux stats, it is done bar the fact it needs to be made into English and not just disjointed sentences.

Good news is I finally cracked and bought many digital downloads of David Devant and Mr.Solo, hopefully this will make my assignments much less painful. The joy of a new band I like, well, new to me anyway. Happiness!

Work, lovelife, miscellaneous

What a weird exam…surely no degree level assessment should have the multiple choice question: “Which of the following celebrities is not a Scientologist?” Well, after a quick google I find I got this question correct, I’m not sure whether that is a good or bad thing! The other questions were bizarre as well, either referring to screaming tomatoes/drug use or they were more semantic word play than questioning understanding. I can kiss any good grades this semester goodbye it seems. With these strange lab sessions and bizarre essays to write the “work” stuff isn’t going so well. I’m going to go for some miscellaneous for awhile.